Mga Pahina

Martes, Hunyo 30, 2020

From an Immigrant's Perspective: Ways Americans can appreciate (more) what they have here in the U.S.A

1. Know and understand your own history, the American history.

Understand what it was like before and how much things changed and so much better now.

To newly naturalized Americans, who are English as Second Language (ESL) speakers like me, the DK's Children's Encyclopedia of American History is easy to read and understand, the pictures and illustrations help a lot too. I imagine myself enjoying reading it again with my children in the near future. The American Reader: Words that  Moved a Nation Edited by Diane Ravitch is another must read. Learning more about American History since I arrived here makes me appreciate of what you have here more and more everyday. Learning our country's history helps us to appreciate what we currently enjoy and those who made sure we are enjoying and still enjoying it now. Knowing history, as they say, helps us not to repeat the same mistakes of the past.

I can't help but to compare and connect the American and Philippine history, the Philippines being colonized by the U.S.A after Spain, and realizing how much influence you have on us too. Comparison is good when it helps to improve things. Comparison is better when it makes you appreciate the differences and improvements of the 'before and after'. Comparison is the best when it gives you contentment cause you know you have more than what others are still wishing for.


2. Read and watch global news and documentaries about other countries, especially third world countries and war-torn countries.

To some sympathetic and empathetic people, reading and watching can be more than enough but to some it may not. Most countries in the world still look up to the U.S.A because of the individual rights you have here. There is no perfect society in the world, but some citizens from other countries are still fighting and working on to have and enjoy the same rights you already have here. The rights you are taking for granted and sadly even abusing at times. Most countries are still on their way trying to copy what you have here and experimenting what will work in their own country. Wanting more and discontentment are human nature but so does gratitude and appreciation.


3. Befriend an immigrant and ask them, listen to their own experiences from their country.

Take an interest to their observations on what you have here, the similarities and differences. Sometimes, listening in real life to a person in front of you can have a better impact. Try to look through their eyes. Most immigrants who are thankful to be here are appreciative and will actually tell you what you have here that they wish they have too back in their home country. Legal immigrants who went through the process and did everything the right way to come and live here have substantial reasons why they left their own countries.

The opportunities you have here, you might not realize how lucky you are that job qualifications don't include your age, gender, height etc. Anyone who can still work and still wants to work have the same opportunities here, we are just starting to see that back at the Philippines where it is not a normal sight to see flight attendants and waiters past on their 40s, 50s and even 60s. Jobs that may be considered physically challenging and put aesthetic on the top employable factor still prefer employees on their 20s and 30s. Here in the U.S.A, I learned that is illegal, you cannot discriminate someone based on age, appearance, gender, race etc.

For me, you are also very accommodating here, respecting and recognizing the languages and cultures the immigrants brought with them. Almost everything and everywhere have available translations of other leading languages. Indeed, the U.S.A. is the melting pot of the world. I believe though that as you respect ours, we should also respect yours, learn your language, history, and culture, adopt and assimilate.


4. Visit another country, better if it is a country who have less but more people are happy and contented (like Bhutan).

As a Filipino, we are known to be one of the happiest and resilient people despite the economic and political challenges, uncontrollable disasters like storms and earthquakes we always experience in our country. We don't have a confrontational culture and are also known for our hospitality. Most Filipinos are very family orientated. However, these traits can be both our strength and weakness. We don't have the Second Amendment and owning a gun is not a norm, most people who get and have them are in the professions that are considered dangerous and get death threats like being a politician or a lawyer.

In the not so distant future, when we have kids already, I want our kids to have a first hand experience of a life in another country, like the Philippines, by visiting once a year or every two years or whenever possible (plane fare is not cheap LOL). They will always be part Filipino because of me and it is always important to know our parent's heritage which is also a part of our own identity. I hope, pray, and wish with all my heart that having that kind of experience will open up their eyes and minds to be more appreciative of what they have here in the U.S.A and also appreciate what the Philippines have. I wish people here can have the same opportunity, I hope when they visit another country it gives them more understanding and appreciation of life in general.

Happy 4th of July!

Happy Independence Day!

I am not an expert, I am not yet an American citizen but I appreciate everything you have here. I am amazed by how the United States of America was founded. American History is fascinating and inspiring. I wrote this article as a way of saying Thank You. As a new immigrant here, as a spouse of an American citizen,  this is my way of saying I love and appreciate this country, this country that I also now call HOME. 

God bless America!

The Anti-Terrorism Bill of the Philippines (ironically called as the Terror Bill)


In the Philippines, a new Anti-Terrorism Act endangers rights, a special Council would usurp court powers. I agree that the Philippines' anti-terror bill is poised to cause more terror, given the abuse of power we are already witnessing.

Now let this be clear, I am even considered pretty conservative on my political views here in the U.S.A. and I am 100% against terrorism and communist insurgencies. I want it to end too in all ways possible, but the fear is that this Philippine bill can also be used to anyone who is critical of the Philippine government (especially the Duterte administration now) is a legitimate concern. Given that the administration is already consolidating so much power from all three branches of the government. Duterte's minions are holding the majority in Congress and Senate (Legislative) and Supreme Court (Judiciary). They tried to bully anyone who is against them, especially those on the oppositions like the removal of previous Chief Justice Sereno, jailing Senator de Lima, belittling Vice President Robredo who works harder during this COVID pandemic than him, making fun/chilidsh personal attack to Diokno  and more. Even ordinary citizens, inside and outside the country. Like the Overseas Filipino Worker (OFW) in Taiwan, our own government tried to deport her for sharing in social media her critical opinions toward the Duterte administration. How ironic and disappointing, Taiwan protected our own citizen from the bullying of our own government. Taiwan refuses to deport caregiver who ‘insulted’ Philippine president on Facebook.

People in our country who posted satirical jokes, disappointments, and frustrations about Duterte and his administration were also arrested without a warrant. teacher, son arrested without warrant in GenSan over Facebook post. The reason behind their post? Hunger (or fear of hunger) during the enforced COVID quarantine. Also, the warrantless arrest of a teacher over tweet threatening Duterte was considered invalid and the court junks case vs teacher who offered bounty to kill Duterte. All these teachers are charged for citing sedition. I do not condone what they did but even Duterte himself always joke about killing (or seriously, to be honest we don't know anymore, it depends on his mood).

Living in a country where a MAN CAN BE SHOT FOR NOT WEARNING A FACE MASK OR NOT FOLLOWING SIMPLE QUARANTINE RULES, even if he is retired soldier suffering post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is something to really WORRY about, what more when they passed a law where someone who bought a knife or anything that can be used as a weapon can already be a suspected terrorist (or anyone decided by their chosen Council). It is more ridiculous now for me cause I live in a country where the right of the people to own a gun is even protected by their Constitution, called the Second Amendment. It is not even a gun you need to own in the Philippines to be a suspected terrorist, a knife will do. LOL.

I support the good intentions behind this Anti-Terrorism Bill, everyone who care about their country and is against terrorism will support this bill, as long as it is modified to make sure that it won't be abused. It is a given that any law can be abuse, but with the Executive branch already abusing its power now and them executing this new law later on. We need an assurance that the final form of this law is clear and the best form it can be to avoid or to be sure that it has the tiniest possibility of being abuse. And that is their job as lawmakers to make sure of that. To find the holes and fix it.

So given these circumstances and what is happening now in the country, these are 5 Things to know about the Philippines' Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020 (these are not my words, from Nikkei Asian Review) :


1. What exactly does this bill say and do?

The Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020 amends the Human Security Act of 2007. It expands the definition of terrorism to include acts intended to cause "death or serious bodily injury to any person," "extensive damage and destruction" to a government facility, private property or critical infrastructure and when the purpose of those acts is to "intimidate [the] general public," "create an atmosphere or message of fear," or "seriously destabilize or destroy the fundamental political, economic and social structures of the country." Those found guilty face life sentences without the chance of parole.

The act also criminalizes the "threat, planning, training, facilitating of" and "proposal" and "inciting" to terrorist activities by means of speeches, proclamations, writings, banners and emblems. It also subjects suspects to surveillance, warrantless arrest and detention for up to 24 days. In addition, it removes compensation for the suspect in the event of acquittal and boosts the Anti-Terrorism Council, the implementer of the law, whose members are appointed by the president.

2. Why is the government pushing it?

Backers of the bill say the legislation seeks to end terrorism in the country, which is still battling decadeslong communist and Islamic insurgencies. In 2017, Islamic State-aligned militants laid siege to the southern city of Marawi; last year the southern region was rocked by suicide bombings.

Even the lockdown did not stop terror, according to presidential spokesperson Harry Roque, who cited the communist rebels' attacks on soldiers securing the distribution of financial aid and attacks by Islamic militants in late May that led to an evacuation in the country's south that uprooted over 6,000 people.

Sen. Panfilo Lacson, a former police chief and proponent of the bill, said the Human Security Act of 2007 "has proved to fail in terms of its efficacy as an anti-terrorism measure," partly because it's lenient for offenders and restrictive for enforcers.

"Under the current Human Security Act, there are only four instances for terrorists to be prosecuted under the law," Lacson said last year. "On the other hand, there are a total of 20 instances where law enforcers can be charged and penalized for violations of the Human Security Act."

3. Why is it being opposed?

The Philippines' Commission on Human Rights said the broad definition of "terrorism" in the bill "paves the road for possible abuse."

"By this broad definition, starting a fight in a bar could technically be classified as an act of terrorism," said Human Rights Watch, which called the act "a human rights disaster in the making."
The overreach, according to CHR, could also be used "to limit substantial freedoms, including expression of dissent, while [with] the vague and overly broad definition, authorities could wantonly tag [the] exercise of rights as terrorist expressions."

Fears are also on the rise due to the Duterte's administration's history of cracking down on political opposition and the recent arrest of government critics during the lockdown. "It's not about going after terrorists," human rights lawyer Jose Manuel Diokno said, "but critics of this administration."

4. What do businesses and the international community have to say about the bill?

At least 16 Philippine business groups have jointly voiced strong opposition, calling the bill "highly divisive because it poses clear and present danger to human rights enshrined in our Constitution at a time [of pandemic] when our nation needs to come together as one."

Meanwhile, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights said the bill "dilutes human rights safeguards, broadens the definition of terrorism and expands the period of detention without a warrant from three to 14 days, extendible by another 10 days. The vague definitions in the Anti-Terrorism Act may violate the principle of legality."

5. What are the chances that it will become law?

Duterte's office received the bill on June 9, giving him 30 days to act on it.
Amid crumbling support for the act -- some lawmakers have withdrawn their backing -- and mounting opposition from businesses, universities and the Catholic Church, the Department of Justice said it will review the bill regarding its potential to violate constitutional rights.

With the bill now on his desk, Duterte can sign or veto it anytime to reflect the executive branch's amendments. If no action is taken on it, the bill automatically becomes law in 30 days.
But given the growing opposition to the proposed law, a legal challenge in the Supreme Court is a possibility.


Once passed, this New Anti-Terrorism Law Would Enhance Duterte’s Power. Here is also an explainer comparing dangers in old law and anti-terror bill. 

To those who will say that anyone against this bill is afraid because they are terrorists, this article answer it: 
[OPINION] Who’s afraid of the new anti-terrorism law? The author was suspected as a rebel at  3 years old. LOL right? But not really. It is not funny anymore when you are the one or someone you love experience it. And with the new law saying you can't complain or sue them (the council and the government) if they commit a mistake of suspecting or identifying you as a terrorist, ruining your reputation, putting you in torture without enough evidence and no need for a warrant. You can't do that here in the U.S.A., I wish the same for the Philippines where individual rights are put on top, protected the most by their Constitution, the government fearing its people and not the people fearing their government (I wish they appreciate it as much as I do as an immigrant, but that would be another topic and post to discuss about 😅 ).
To those who need more and can't analyze enough by themselves (oops sorry! but not really sorry), these are interesting reads:
What can we do once Duterte signed it into a law or either way it becomes a law? Support the petition that Carpio and the others will file against it! Watch the Supreme Court and pray they will do their jobs and interpret it the way it is, unconstitutional! Let our representatives hear us and let them revised it to the best form it can be, once proven that this law is really needed and the old law is not enough after smart deliberation that we all know. Unlike what happened that they passed it during the COVID pandemic when all of us are busy focusing on COVID issues and more (like China's bullying and militarization in our islands and thanks to Duterte's support and selling us off which again is another topic and post to discuss about 😅).